<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 26 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212960</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT&#039;s deletion of a Rs.10,46,067 disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that for disallowance under Section 14A, there must be a finding of actual expenditure incurred for earning exempted income. Citing precedent, the Court emphasized the need for a clear link between expenditure and exempted income. The appeal was rejected based on consistent legal interpretations in previous cases, reinforcing the principle that disallowance under Section 14A cannot be upheld without evidence of expenditure related to earning exempted income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 26 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212960</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT&#039;s deletion of a Rs.10,46,067 disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that for disallowance under Section 14A, there must be a finding of actual expenditure incurred for earning exempted income. Citing precedent, the Court emphasized the need for a clear link between expenditure and exempted income. The appeal was rejected based on consistent legal interpretations in previous cases, reinforcing the principle that disallowance under Section 14A cannot be upheld without evidence of expenditure related to earning exempted income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>