<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 12 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212946</link>
    <description>The court upheld the penalty imposition under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the appellant for availing illegal CENVAT credit. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding transit loss, mens rea, and lack of due consideration by the authorities were considered but ultimately dismissed. The court emphasized the statutory nature of the penalty waiver provision under proviso 11AC, highlighting the appellant&#039;s failure to comply with timely payment requirements, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 12 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212946</link>
      <description>The court upheld the penalty imposition under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the appellant for availing illegal CENVAT credit. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding transit loss, mens rea, and lack of due consideration by the authorities were considered but ultimately dismissed. The court emphasized the statutory nature of the penalty waiver provision under proviso 11AC, highlighting the appellant&#039;s failure to comply with timely payment requirements, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>