<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 3 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212927</link>
    <description>ITAT Bangalore allowed the assessee&#039;s claim under s.10A by holding that communication expenses (internet charges) reduced from export turnover must also be reduced from total turnover for computing the deduction, thereby granting a higher eligible deduction. On transfer pricing, the Tribunal held that the TPO erred in rejecting the assessee&#039;s filters and adopting new comparables based on information obtained u/s 133(6) without affording adequate opportunity to rebut or cross-examine. Following its earlier guidelines in a similar case, ITAT remanded the matter to the AO/TPO for fresh determination of arm&#039;s length price, after granting the assessee full opportunity to contest the comparables and underlying data.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 13:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 3 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212927</link>
      <description>ITAT Bangalore allowed the assessee&#039;s claim under s.10A by holding that communication expenses (internet charges) reduced from export turnover must also be reduced from total turnover for computing the deduction, thereby granting a higher eligible deduction. On transfer pricing, the Tribunal held that the TPO erred in rejecting the assessee&#039;s filters and adopting new comparables based on information obtained u/s 133(6) without affording adequate opportunity to rebut or cross-examine. Following its earlier guidelines in a similar case, ITAT remanded the matter to the AO/TPO for fresh determination of arm&#039;s length price, after granting the assessee full opportunity to contest the comparables and underlying data.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>