<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 583 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212923</link>
    <description>The revision application was successful as the government set aside the Order-in-Appeal and reinstated the Order-in-Original, ruling that re-export of the seized goods was not allowed under the Customs Act. Despite the delay in filing the revision application being condoned, the government held that goods confiscated for smuggling could not be re-exported, in line with legal precedents and Section 80 of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 08:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 583 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212923</link>
      <description>The revision application was successful as the government set aside the Order-in-Appeal and reinstated the Order-in-Original, ruling that re-export of the seized goods was not allowed under the Customs Act. Despite the delay in filing the revision application being condoned, the government held that goods confiscated for smuggling could not be re-exported, in line with legal precedents and Section 80 of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>