https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212920 A revised order enhancing annual production capacity and monthly duty liability was set aside because it was made suo motu without giving the affected party any prior hearing. The court held that the absence of fresh material or valid justification reinforced the breach of natural justice. Although an appellate remedy was available, it did not bar judicial interference where the impugned order was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. The petitioner was therefore not relegated to the appellate remedy, and the order dated 4 January 2011 was quashed. en-us Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212920 A revised order enhancing annual production capacity and monthly duty liability was set aside because it was made suo motu without giving the affected party any prior hearing. The court held that the absence of fresh material or valid justification reinforced the breach of natural justice. Although an appellate remedy was available, it did not bar judicial interference where the impugned order was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. The petitioner was therefore not relegated to the appellate remedy, and the order dated 4 January 2011 was quashed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212920