<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 578 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212917</link>
    <description>The appeals (E/949 and E/1280 of 2009) were dismissed for non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with Tribunal directives and the provisions of the Act to avoid dismissal of appeals, highlighting the consequences of failure to adhere to stay orders and the need for timely action in legal proceedings. The decision underscored the significance of following court procedures and fulfilling obligations set forth by the Tribunal to maintain the integrity of the legal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 578 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212917</link>
      <description>The appeals (E/949 and E/1280 of 2009) were dismissed for non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with Tribunal directives and the provisions of the Act to avoid dismissal of appeals, highlighting the consequences of failure to adhere to stay orders and the need for timely action in legal proceedings. The decision underscored the significance of following court procedures and fulfilling obligations set forth by the Tribunal to maintain the integrity of the legal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>