<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 577 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212916</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the condonation of a 74-day delay in filing the appeal and reduced the penalty amount from Rs.15,000/- to Rs.3,000/- for a Central Excise assessee who failed to electronically deposit excise duty. The Tribunal stressed the importance of procedural compliance, even without mens rea, in upholding public interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 577 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212916</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the condonation of a 74-day delay in filing the appeal and reduced the penalty amount from Rs.15,000/- to Rs.3,000/- for a Central Excise assessee who failed to electronically deposit excise duty. The Tribunal stressed the importance of procedural compliance, even without mens rea, in upholding public interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>