https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212909 The Tribunal found that the applicants were liable to pay service tax for their construction activities, categorized under different headings by the department for various periods. The Tribunal did not accept the applicants' arguments regarding liability before 01.06.2007 and the applicability of a High Court decision. It directed the applicants to make a specified deposit to waive the pre-deposit of the remaining dues, granting a stay on recovery during the appeal process. The Tribunal emphasized the need for compliance with the deposit deadline. en-us Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212909 The Tribunal found that the applicants were liable to pay service tax for their construction activities, categorized under different headings by the department for various periods. The Tribunal did not accept the applicants' arguments regarding liability before 01.06.2007 and the applicability of a High Court decision. It directed the applicants to make a specified deposit to waive the pre-deposit of the remaining dues, granting a stay on recovery during the appeal process. The Tribunal emphasized the need for compliance with the deposit deadline. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212909