<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 468 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212906</link>
    <description>The High Court remitted the issue of taxability on account of undisclosed investment in the purchase of property No. 1028, Sector 15-II, Gurgaon back to the tribunal for re-examination. The tribunal&#039;s findings on the valuation report-based additions were upheld due to the lack of material evidence. The classification of income was deemed irrelevant for the purpose of block assessment. The appeal was disposed of with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 468 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212906</link>
      <description>The High Court remitted the issue of taxability on account of undisclosed investment in the purchase of property No. 1028, Sector 15-II, Gurgaon back to the tribunal for re-examination. The tribunal&#039;s findings on the valuation report-based additions were upheld due to the lack of material evidence. The classification of income was deemed irrelevant for the purpose of block assessment. The appeal was disposed of with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>