<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 466 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212904</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) as made by the Assessing Officer. The judgment emphasized the conflicting views on the retrospective application of the section and the importance of judicial decisions in resolving such disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 466 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212904</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) as made by the Assessing Officer. The judgment emphasized the conflicting views on the retrospective application of the section and the importance of judicial decisions in resolving such disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>