https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212901 The court referred the case to a larger bench to resolve the conflict between the requirement of recording and communicating reasons under Section 127(1) of the Income Tax Act, as mandated in a previous case, and a conflicting interpretation in another case. The court questioned whether the non-disclosure of reasons in a transfer order vitiates the order or if subsequent disclosure through an affidavit can cure the defect. The matter was directed to the Acting Chief Justice for appropriate orders in terms of the reference. en-us Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212901 The court referred the case to a larger bench to resolve the conflict between the requirement of recording and communicating reasons under Section 127(1) of the Income Tax Act, as mandated in a previous case, and a conflicting interpretation in another case. The court questioned whether the non-disclosure of reasons in a transfer order vitiates the order or if subsequent disclosure through an affidavit can cure the defect. The matter was directed to the Acting Chief Justice for appropriate orders in terms of the reference. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212901