<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 572 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212894</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the respondent was eligible for the small-scale exemption under the Central Excise Act as the brand name &quot;RAVI MASALE&quot; was jointly owned by the Jain family members, permitting each member to utilize the brand for their business pursuits. The judgment highlighted the unique circumstances of the case and differentiated it from prior decisions referenced by the department, resulting in the dismissal of the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 572 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212894</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the respondent was eligible for the small-scale exemption under the Central Excise Act as the brand name &quot;RAVI MASALE&quot; was jointly owned by the Jain family members, permitting each member to utilize the brand for their business pursuits. The judgment highlighted the unique circumstances of the case and differentiated it from prior decisions referenced by the department, resulting in the dismissal of the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>