<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 570 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212892</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld duty liability on denatured alcohol, rejected a refund claim, confirmed excise duty applicability on denatured alcohol used in manufacturing after shave lotion, and disallowed the extended period for duty demand, remanding the case for quantification within the normal one-year limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 570 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212892</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld duty liability on denatured alcohol, rejected a refund claim, confirmed excise duty applicability on denatured alcohol used in manufacturing after shave lotion, and disallowed the extended period for duty demand, remanding the case for quantification within the normal one-year limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>