<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 567 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212889</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that interest liability arises automatically upon delayed payment of duty, and no separate notice is required for its recovery. The demand for interest was found to be time-barred for the period before July 2008, as the demand notice was issued beyond a reasonable period. The Tribunal directed the original adjudicating authority to re-quantify the interest liability for the normal one-year period, instructing the appellant to discharge the interest liability as re-quantified. The appeal and stay application were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 567 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212889</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that interest liability arises automatically upon delayed payment of duty, and no separate notice is required for its recovery. The demand for interest was found to be time-barred for the period before July 2008, as the demand notice was issued beyond a reasonable period. The Tribunal directed the original adjudicating authority to re-quantify the interest liability for the normal one-year period, instructing the appellant to discharge the interest liability as re-quantified. The appeal and stay application were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>