<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 520 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212884</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld that &quot;outdoor catering services&quot; provided in the factory canteen qualify as &#039;input services&#039; for CENVAT credit, rejecting the Department&#039;s argument based on worker count. The Tribunal also denied CENVAT credit for &quot;group insurance service&quot; based on a High Court precedent favoring the assessee. The decision emphasized the importance of legal precedents and consistency in interpreting the CENVAT Credit Rules, underscoring the need for adherence to established legal principles in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 520 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212884</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld that &quot;outdoor catering services&quot; provided in the factory canteen qualify as &#039;input services&#039; for CENVAT credit, rejecting the Department&#039;s argument based on worker count. The Tribunal also denied CENVAT credit for &quot;group insurance service&quot; based on a High Court precedent favoring the assessee. The decision emphasized the importance of legal precedents and consistency in interpreting the CENVAT Credit Rules, underscoring the need for adherence to established legal principles in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>