<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 453 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212880</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and directing a reevaluation of the revision petition on its merits. The Court emphasized the importance of substantial justice and public policy in condoning delays and ensuring that legal remedies are not foreclosed due to procedural lapses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 453 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212880</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and directing a reevaluation of the revision petition on its merits. The Court emphasized the importance of substantial justice and public policy in condoning delays and ensuring that legal remedies are not foreclosed due to procedural lapses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>