<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 452 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212879</link>
    <description>The court ruled against the appellant-committees, holding that they are not entitled to the exemption under Section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act as they do not meet the definition of &quot;local authority.&quot; The imposition of interest under Sections 234A and 234B was upheld due to the denial of the exemption claim. The court affirmed the decisions of the lower authorities and the Tribunal, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 452 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212879</link>
      <description>The court ruled against the appellant-committees, holding that they are not entitled to the exemption under Section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act as they do not meet the definition of &quot;local authority.&quot; The imposition of interest under Sections 234A and 234B was upheld due to the denial of the exemption claim. The court affirmed the decisions of the lower authorities and the Tribunal, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>