<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 448 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212875</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decisions on the date of setting up the business, capitalization of expenses, and legal charges. However, it remanded the decision on the capitalization of expenses for further examination of factual aspects. The appeal was partly allowed and disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 448 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212875</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decisions on the date of setting up the business, capitalization of expenses, and legal charges. However, it remanded the decision on the capitalization of expenses for further examination of factual aspects. The appeal was partly allowed and disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>