<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 560 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212864</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the Applicant&#039;s request for a total waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty for items under Chapter 34 of the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal directed the Applicant to deposit an additional amount of Rs. 25,000 within four weeks, in addition to the amount already deposited. Upon compliance, the pre-deposit of the remaining duty and penalty amounts was waived, with recovery stayed during the Appeal&#039;s pendency. The Tribunal found that the items in question, Hydraulic Oil and Hadilin, were not considered parts or accessories of capital goods, resulting in the partial grant of the waiver subject to the specified additional deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 560 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212864</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the Applicant&#039;s request for a total waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty for items under Chapter 34 of the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal directed the Applicant to deposit an additional amount of Rs. 25,000 within four weeks, in addition to the amount already deposited. Upon compliance, the pre-deposit of the remaining duty and penalty amounts was waived, with recovery stayed during the Appeal&#039;s pendency. The Tribunal found that the items in question, Hydraulic Oil and Hadilin, were not considered parts or accessories of capital goods, resulting in the partial grant of the waiver subject to the specified additional deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>