<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 559 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212863</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Central Excise Appeal, upholding the decision of the CESTAT to reject the appellant&#039;s claim for refund of duty paid on High Speed Diesel (HSD) oil. The court emphasized that new issues not raised before the CESTAT cannot be considered under Section 35G(6) of the Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The appellant&#039;s argument for refund under Section 11B was deemed ineligible due to the interpretation of the relevant rules, specifically Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 559 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212863</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Central Excise Appeal, upholding the decision of the CESTAT to reject the appellant&#039;s claim for refund of duty paid on High Speed Diesel (HSD) oil. The court emphasized that new issues not raised before the CESTAT cannot be considered under Section 35G(6) of the Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The appellant&#039;s argument for refund under Section 11B was deemed ineligible due to the interpretation of the relevant rules, specifically Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>