<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 558 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212862</link>
    <description>In a classification dispute over venetian blinds, prima facie merit was found in the assessee&#039;s claim that the goods were classifiable as made-up textile articles under CETH 6303 92 00, rather than under Tariff Heading 3925 30 00, relying on prior tribunal authority that treated predominantly textile venetian blinds as textile articles. On that basis, waiver of pre-deposit of duty and interest was granted and recovery was stayed pending the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 558 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212862</link>
      <description>In a classification dispute over venetian blinds, prima facie merit was found in the assessee&#039;s claim that the goods were classifiable as made-up textile articles under CETH 6303 92 00, rather than under Tariff Heading 3925 30 00, relying on prior tribunal authority that treated predominantly textile venetian blinds as textile articles. On that basis, waiver of pre-deposit of duty and interest was granted and recovery was stayed pending the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>