<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 441 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212853</link>
    <description>The court upheld the re-opening of assessment for a Private Limited Company under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. Despite objections regarding the legitimacy of share capital sources, the court found a valid nexus between the material gathered from the Investigation Wing and the reasons for re-assessment. The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s belief of income escaping assessment due to discrepancies in share capital details and lack of full disclosure by the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 441 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212853</link>
      <description>The court upheld the re-opening of assessment for a Private Limited Company under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. Despite objections regarding the legitimacy of share capital sources, the court found a valid nexus between the material gathered from the Investigation Wing and the reasons for re-assessment. The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s belief of income escaping assessment due to discrepancies in share capital details and lack of full disclosure by the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>