<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 545 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212831</link>
    <description>The Served From India Scheme entitled eligible service providers to benefits on free foreign exchange earned, and the Foreign Trade Policy did not adopt a net foreign exchange formula for SFIS. A circular and PIC minutes sought to deny or curtail benefits in three telecom call scenarios by introducing netting-off and by reopening concluded claims. That approach was treated as a substantive change to the policy, not a mere clarification, because the service chain in the international call scenarios fell within the definition of service provider and the earned foreign exchange could not be reduced by importing a concept absent from the policy text. The circular was therefore ultra vires to the extent it required reopening, recovery, and implementation of the disputed directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 545 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212831</link>
      <description>The Served From India Scheme entitled eligible service providers to benefits on free foreign exchange earned, and the Foreign Trade Policy did not adopt a net foreign exchange formula for SFIS. A circular and PIC minutes sought to deny or curtail benefits in three telecom call scenarios by introducing netting-off and by reopening concluded claims. That approach was treated as a substantive change to the policy, not a mere clarification, because the service chain in the international call scenarios fell within the definition of service provider and the earned foreign exchange could not be reduced by importing a concept absent from the policy text. The circular was therefore ultra vires to the extent it required reopening, recovery, and implementation of the disputed directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>