<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 544 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212830</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, annulling the anti-dumping duty on coumarin due to the Designated Authority&#039;s failure to provide a fair hearing to the appellant-Association. The decision stressed the necessity of granting all concerned parties a proper hearing in anti-dumping investigations to uphold legal standards and safeguard stakeholder interests. The case was remanded for a fresh decision within six months, with provisional assessment of future imports until then.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 544 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212830</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, annulling the anti-dumping duty on coumarin due to the Designated Authority&#039;s failure to provide a fair hearing to the appellant-Association. The decision stressed the necessity of granting all concerned parties a proper hearing in anti-dumping investigations to uphold legal standards and safeguard stakeholder interests. The case was remanded for a fresh decision within six months, with provisional assessment of future imports until then.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>