<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 541 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212811</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, ruled in an appeal involving the reversal of input service credit for manufacturing dutiable and exempted final products. The Tribunal determined that if the appellant had already reversed inadmissible input service credit for exempted final products and sought certification from the adjudicating authority, there was no need to reverse 8/10% of the value of exempted final products at the time of removal. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement, disposed of the appeal, and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for verification. The adjudicating authority was instructed to issue an appropriate order after examining the facts and giving the appellant an opportunity to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 541 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212811</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, ruled in an appeal involving the reversal of input service credit for manufacturing dutiable and exempted final products. The Tribunal determined that if the appellant had already reversed inadmissible input service credit for exempted final products and sought certification from the adjudicating authority, there was no need to reverse 8/10% of the value of exempted final products at the time of removal. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement, disposed of the appeal, and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for verification. The adjudicating authority was instructed to issue an appropriate order after examining the facts and giving the appellant an opportunity to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>