<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 529 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, dropping the penalty imposed on them under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal found that there was no suppression of facts or intent to evade duty, emphasizing that the classification list was known to the department. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the penalty being waived for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 529 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, dropping the penalty imposed on them under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal found that there was no suppression of facts or intent to evade duty, emphasizing that the classification list was known to the department. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the penalty being waived for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>