<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 528 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212783</link>
    <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, DELHI challenged the denial of cenvat credit on staging/structure material claimed as capital goods. The appellant, a manufacturer of sugar and molasses, argued that the materials were essential for supporting equipment related to sugar manufacturing, making them eligible for credit. The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, instructing a fresh consideration in line with a relevant decision and ensuring a fair opportunity for the appellants to present their case. This outcome provided the appellant with a chance for a reassessment of their eligibility for cenvat credit on the disputed materials.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 528 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212783</link>
      <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, DELHI challenged the denial of cenvat credit on staging/structure material claimed as capital goods. The appellant, a manufacturer of sugar and molasses, argued that the materials were essential for supporting equipment related to sugar manufacturing, making them eligible for credit. The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, instructing a fresh consideration in line with a relevant decision and ensuring a fair opportunity for the appellants to present their case. This outcome provided the appellant with a chance for a reassessment of their eligibility for cenvat credit on the disputed materials.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>