<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 526 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212781</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants, cocoa manufacturers, to deduct cheque discounting charges from the assessable value, citing previous decisions permitting deductions for bank charges. The Tribunal held that irrespective of the nature of the charges, whether local or outstation, deductions for bank charges were permissible. Relying on the case law presented by the appellants, the Tribunal concluded in favor of the appellants, modifying the orders and allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 526 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212781</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants, cocoa manufacturers, to deduct cheque discounting charges from the assessable value, citing previous decisions permitting deductions for bank charges. The Tribunal held that irrespective of the nature of the charges, whether local or outstation, deductions for bank charges were permissible. Relying on the case law presented by the appellants, the Tribunal concluded in favor of the appellants, modifying the orders and allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>