<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 418 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212766</link>
    <description>The court held that the penalty under Section 158BFA(2) of the Income-tax Act is discretionary, not mandatory. It found in favor of the assessee on this issue. However, the court determined that the Tribunal erred in deleting the penalties, ruling in favor of the Revenue. The court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and remanded the case for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 418 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212766</link>
      <description>The court held that the penalty under Section 158BFA(2) of the Income-tax Act is discretionary, not mandatory. It found in favor of the assessee on this issue. However, the court determined that the Tribunal erred in deleting the penalties, ruling in favor of the Revenue. The court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and remanded the case for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>