<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 401 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212740</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the denial of deduction under section 54 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee&#039;s claim for exemption based on advances made for property purchase beyond the prescribed time limit was deemed unsustainable. The tribunal found that the property was neither acquired nor constructed within the stipulated period, and the reliance on supervening impossibilities was unfounded, leading to the rejection of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 401 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212740</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the denial of deduction under section 54 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee&#039;s claim for exemption based on advances made for property purchase beyond the prescribed time limit was deemed unsustainable. The tribunal found that the property was neither acquired nor constructed within the stipulated period, and the reliance on supervening impossibilities was unfounded, leading to the rejection of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>