<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 395 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212734</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming the addition made by the AO under Section 115JB of the I.T. Act. It was held that the AO had the authority to review the accounts to ensure compliance with Part II and Part III of Schedule VI of the Companies Act, 1956. The appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 395 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212734</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming the addition made by the AO under Section 115JB of the I.T. Act. It was held that the AO had the authority to review the accounts to ensure compliance with Part II and Part III of Schedule VI of the Companies Act, 1956. The appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>