<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 518 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212728</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s view, rejecting the appellant&#039;s claim for adjustment of excess duty payment against short payment. The finalization of provisional assessment was ordered to be based on invoice value, excluding demurrage charges from the assessable value. The appeal was disposed of with modifications, including the re-examination of specific issues arising from Bills of Entry by the original authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 518 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212728</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s view, rejecting the appellant&#039;s claim for adjustment of excess duty payment against short payment. The finalization of provisional assessment was ordered to be based on invoice value, excluding demurrage charges from the assessable value. The appeal was disposed of with modifications, including the re-examination of specific issues arising from Bills of Entry by the original authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>