https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212721 CENVAT credit on M.S. angles, channels and beams was found inadmissible because the Tribunal treated them as ineligible inputs under the Larger Bench ruling in Vandana Globals. The same view had already been taken in the appellant's own case, and no basis was found to depart from that position. The demand was therefore sustained and the appeal rejected. en-us Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212721 CENVAT credit on M.S. angles, channels and beams was found inadmissible because the Tribunal treated them as ineligible inputs under the Larger Bench ruling in Vandana Globals. The same view had already been taken in the appellant's own case, and no basis was found to depart from that position. The demand was therefore sustained and the appeal rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212721