<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 374 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212709</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to treat plant and machinery (not in use) as long term capital assets, exempt from Section 50 of the Income Tax Act due to the absence of claimed depreciation. The clear separation of assets by the assessee was pivotal in determining the tax treatment of the assets sold. The judgment emphasized the significance of factual findings and the interpretation of relevant provisions in evaluating the tax consequences of asset sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 374 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212709</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to treat plant and machinery (not in use) as long term capital assets, exempt from Section 50 of the Income Tax Act due to the absence of claimed depreciation. The clear separation of assets by the assessee was pivotal in determining the tax treatment of the assets sold. The judgment emphasized the significance of factual findings and the interpretation of relevant provisions in evaluating the tax consequences of asset sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>