https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212699 The challenge concerned whether the confirmed demand of duty, interest and penalty could be sustained. The Bench treated the issue as identical to an earlier matter already remanded by the same Bench, and followed that course. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was sent back to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration in light of the earlier remand. As a result, the demand confirmation, interest and penalty were not finally sustained and remained open for reconsideration. en-us Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212699 The challenge concerned whether the confirmed demand of duty, interest and penalty could be sustained. The Bench treated the issue as identical to an earlier matter already remanded by the same Bench, and followed that course. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was sent back to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration in light of the earlier remand. As a result, the demand confirmation, interest and penalty were not finally sustained and remained open for reconsideration. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212699