<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 364 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212696</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, allowed the appeals by remanding the case back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the consideration of shortages of MS/SS coils and emphasized the need to verify the appellant&#039;s reconciliation and explanations. The Tribunal highlighted the necessity to deduct the quantity of 17,100 kgs of SS coils from the alleged unaccounted clearances. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was remanded for further consideration following the principles of natural justice, without expressing any opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 07:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 364 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212696</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, allowed the appeals by remanding the case back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the consideration of shortages of MS/SS coils and emphasized the need to verify the appellant&#039;s reconciliation and explanations. The Tribunal highlighted the necessity to deduct the quantity of 17,100 kgs of SS coils from the alleged unaccounted clearances. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was remanded for further consideration following the principles of natural justice, without expressing any opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>