<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 355 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on most issues. However, the Tribunal directed an adjustment to the opening stock of the subsequent year, following the precedent set by the jurisdictional High Court in a related case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 355 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on most issues. However, the Tribunal directed an adjustment to the opening stock of the subsequent year, following the precedent set by the jurisdictional High Court in a related case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>