<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 785 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212679</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 66,62,980 as unaccounted commission income, applying a 2% rate on total turnover due to discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s explanations and lack of evidence for claimed commission rates. Despite the appellant&#039;s contentions, the Tribunal determined a 0.75% commission rate based on inconsistencies in statements and upheld the assessment, dismissing the appeal for lack of substantial legal question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 785 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212679</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 66,62,980 as unaccounted commission income, applying a 2% rate on total turnover due to discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s explanations and lack of evidence for claimed commission rates. Despite the appellant&#039;s contentions, the Tribunal determined a 0.75% commission rate based on inconsistencies in statements and upheld the assessment, dismissing the appeal for lack of substantial legal question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>