<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 512 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212668</link>
    <description>The Court rejected the appeals, ruling that the activity in question did not fall under Goods Transport Agency (GTA) service subject to service tax. The Court held that the appeals were not maintainable as per Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act and directed the Revenue to file a statutory appeal under Section 35-L of the Act to the Apex Court for further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 512 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212668</link>
      <description>The Court rejected the appeals, ruling that the activity in question did not fall under Goods Transport Agency (GTA) service subject to service tax. The Court held that the appeals were not maintainable as per Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act and directed the Revenue to file a statutory appeal under Section 35-L of the Act to the Apex Court for further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>