<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 973 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212641</link>
    <description>Captively consumed zinc and lead concentrates valued under Rule 6(b)(ii) must be assessed on accepted cost-of-production principles. CAS-4 excludes interest on loans from the elements of production cost, so that component could not be added to the valuation. Alleged loss of raw materials also could not be included because the department produced no evidence that the loss related to a recoverable production cost. The revenue valuation on both components was therefore unsustainable, and the consequential demand failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 973 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212641</link>
      <description>Captively consumed zinc and lead concentrates valued under Rule 6(b)(ii) must be assessed on accepted cost-of-production principles. CAS-4 excludes interest on loans from the elements of production cost, so that component could not be added to the valuation. Alleged loss of raw materials also could not be included because the department produced no evidence that the loss related to a recoverable production cost. The revenue valuation on both components was therefore unsustainable, and the consequential demand failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>