https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212621 The Court upheld the CESTAT's decision to dismiss the appeal for non-compliance with a pre-deposit order. The appellant's argument that the services provided were not Clearing and Forwarding Agent's services but assistance to principals was rejected. The Court found that the appellant's activities went beyond procuring orders, involving direct handling of goods. Thus, the Tribunal's direction for pre-deposit and subsequent dismissal of the appeal were deemed justified, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with no costs awarded. en-us Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jul 2014 12:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212621 The Court upheld the CESTAT's decision to dismiss the appeal for non-compliance with a pre-deposit order. The appellant's argument that the services provided were not Clearing and Forwarding Agent's services but assistance to principals was rejected. The Court found that the appellant's activities went beyond procuring orders, involving direct handling of goods. Thus, the Tribunal's direction for pre-deposit and subsequent dismissal of the appeal were deemed justified, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212621