<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 970 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212617</link>
    <description>The Hon&#039;ble High Court remanded the case to determine the penalty afresh, emphasizing the need to consider all aspects in the Tribunal&#039;s discretion. Penalties were upheld for issuing fake invoices enabling duty evasion, with penalties equal to the evaded duty amount. The Tribunal&#039;s discretion in fixing penalties was affirmed, considering the gravity of offenses and not differentiating between manufacturers and dealers. Factors like offense gravity and impact were crucial in penalty imposition for passing on credit without goods. The judgment dismissed appeals, upholding penalties based on severity of violations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 970 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212617</link>
      <description>The Hon&#039;ble High Court remanded the case to determine the penalty afresh, emphasizing the need to consider all aspects in the Tribunal&#039;s discretion. Penalties were upheld for issuing fake invoices enabling duty evasion, with penalties equal to the evaded duty amount. The Tribunal&#039;s discretion in fixing penalties was affirmed, considering the gravity of offenses and not differentiating between manufacturers and dealers. Factors like offense gravity and impact were crucial in penalty imposition for passing on credit without goods. The judgment dismissed appeals, upholding penalties based on severity of violations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>