<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1170 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212612</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of a partial pre-deposit for the appellants in a service tax dispute. The appellants&#039; plea to dispense with pre-deposit was partially accepted, with a directive for a 50% pre-deposit of the duty demand within six weeks. The Tribunal found the issues surrounding the applicability of Section 66A and the liability of the service recipient to be contentious, ultimately ruling against the appellants on these grounds. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; contention on limitation and emphasized the nature of services provided by the foreign company, leading to the decision for partial pre-deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1170 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212612</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of a partial pre-deposit for the appellants in a service tax dispute. The appellants&#039; plea to dispense with pre-deposit was partially accepted, with a directive for a 50% pre-deposit of the duty demand within six weeks. The Tribunal found the issues surrounding the applicability of Section 66A and the liability of the service recipient to be contentious, ultimately ruling against the appellants on these grounds. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; contention on limitation and emphasized the nature of services provided by the foreign company, leading to the decision for partial pre-deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>