<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 319 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212606</link>
    <description>The court upheld the taxability of Rs. 375 lacs as capital gains under Section 50B of the Income Tax Act in a case involving a Scheme of Arrangement sanctioned by the High Court. It clarified that Section 50B applies to transfers of business for lump sum consideration without individual values assigned to assets and liabilities. The court rejected arguments against the applicability of Section 50B to court-sanctioned arrangements, emphasizing the broad interpretation of &#039;slump sale&#039; and &#039;transfer&#039;. The petition was dismissed, affirming the tax liability and highlighting the inclusive nature of the term &#039;transfer&#039; under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 319 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212606</link>
      <description>The court upheld the taxability of Rs. 375 lacs as capital gains under Section 50B of the Income Tax Act in a case involving a Scheme of Arrangement sanctioned by the High Court. It clarified that Section 50B applies to transfers of business for lump sum consideration without individual values assigned to assets and liabilities. The court rejected arguments against the applicability of Section 50B to court-sanctioned arrangements, emphasizing the broad interpretation of &#039;slump sale&#039; and &#039;transfer&#039;. The petition was dismissed, affirming the tax liability and highlighting the inclusive nature of the term &#039;transfer&#039; under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>