<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1446 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212598</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the customs&#039; findings of over-invoicing and confiscation of goods by M/s. Silk City Petrofils Co. Ltd. (SCPL). Penalties imposed on various parties were reduced to align with the actual value of the goods. The Tribunal validated the market survey and rejected claims of intending to claim DEPB benefits. Central Excise&#039;s final assessment was not proven, and the proportionality of redemption fine and penalties was adjusted. The penalty on an employee was removed due to lack of evidence of involvement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1446 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212598</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the customs&#039; findings of over-invoicing and confiscation of goods by M/s. Silk City Petrofils Co. Ltd. (SCPL). Penalties imposed on various parties were reduced to align with the actual value of the goods. The Tribunal validated the market survey and rejected claims of intending to claim DEPB benefits. Central Excise&#039;s final assessment was not proven, and the proportionality of redemption fine and penalties was adjusted. The penalty on an employee was removed due to lack of evidence of involvement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>