<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 305 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212583</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. It directed the deletion of the adjustment under Section 92CA(3) of the Income Tax Act, and reduced the disallowance under Section 14A. However, the claim for depreciation on goodwill and other intangible assets was dismissed. Grounds 4 to 6 were not pressed by the assessee and were dismissed as academic in nature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 305 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212583</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. It directed the deletion of the adjustment under Section 92CA(3) of the Income Tax Act, and reduced the disallowance under Section 14A. However, the claim for depreciation on goodwill and other intangible assets was dismissed. Grounds 4 to 6 were not pressed by the assessee and were dismissed as academic in nature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>