<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 832 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212579</link>
    <description>The court held that the applicant, already engaged in the business of import, was not eligible to seek an Advance Ruling for a proposed new business activity under the Customs Act. The term &quot;activity&quot; was interpreted narrowly as import or export only, excluding broader meanings. While the majority rejected the applications, Member J.K. Batra dissented, advocating for a broader interpretation and eligibility for the applicant. Ultimately, the majority opinion prevailed, denying the applicant&#039;s request for an Advance Ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 832 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212579</link>
      <description>The court held that the applicant, already engaged in the business of import, was not eligible to seek an Advance Ruling for a proposed new business activity under the Customs Act. The term &quot;activity&quot; was interpreted narrowly as import or export only, excluding broader meanings. While the majority rejected the applications, Member J.K. Batra dissented, advocating for a broader interpretation and eligibility for the applicant. Ultimately, the majority opinion prevailed, denying the applicant&#039;s request for an Advance Ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>