<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 302 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212578</link>
    <description>The Court held that the debt of Rs. 24,75,128/- was a crystallized debt owed by the Company to the Firm. The Company&#039;s application to recall the admission order was dismissed, and the Firm was allowed to transfer the deposited amount to ongoing arbitration proceedings. The petition for winding up was ordered to be closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 302 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212578</link>
      <description>The Court held that the debt of Rs. 24,75,128/- was a crystallized debt owed by the Company to the Firm. The Company&#039;s application to recall the admission order was dismissed, and the Firm was allowed to transfer the deposited amount to ongoing arbitration proceedings. The petition for winding up was ordered to be closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>