<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 498 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212555</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, vacated the findings of the CIT(A), and canceled the penalties imposed by the AO. The Tribunal held that the erroneous claim for deduction under section 80IA, in the absence of any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, was not a ground for levying penalty. The appeals were allowed, and the penalties were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 498 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212555</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, vacated the findings of the CIT(A), and canceled the penalties imposed by the AO. The Tribunal held that the erroneous claim for deduction under section 80IA, in the absence of any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, was not a ground for levying penalty. The appeals were allowed, and the penalties were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>