<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 497 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in the case involving the assessment of fringe benefit tax (FBT) on various expenditures by a company in the life insurance business for the assessment year 2006-07. It emphasized that FBT should only apply to expenses directly related to employment and not those incurred in the course of business that do not benefit employees. The Tribunal allowed the introduction of additional evidence related to travel and telephone expenses, stressed the need for clear segregation of expenditure between employees and non-employees, and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision on telephone/fax and conveyance expenses, ultimately granting relief to the assessee and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 497 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in the case involving the assessment of fringe benefit tax (FBT) on various expenditures by a company in the life insurance business for the assessment year 2006-07. It emphasized that FBT should only apply to expenses directly related to employment and not those incurred in the course of business that do not benefit employees. The Tribunal allowed the introduction of additional evidence related to travel and telephone expenses, stressed the need for clear segregation of expenditure between employees and non-employees, and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision on telephone/fax and conveyance expenses, ultimately granting relief to the assessee and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>